Specifications Of VIVO Y72

The device was released in March 2021. the Vivo Y72 5G will be included in the Advanced section. It comes with an all-camera setup that includes an incredibly high-resolution camera of 64 MP and other impressive specifications. Let’s look at the results of our range of Battery protocols tests.

Specifications for key specifications:

Battery capacity 5000 mAh

18W charger included

6.58-inch, 1080 x 2408, 90 Hz IPS LCD display

Mediatek Dimensity 700 , 5G (7 num) chipset

Tested the RAM/storage combination 8GB plus 128GB

What is DXOMARK Tests for battery: To aid in scoring and analysis in our battery reviews for smartphones, DXOMARK engineers perform a diverse array of objective tests for a period of a week both indoors and out. 

This article will highlight the most significant results from our tests. (See our introduction and the way we test articles for more information about our battery protocol for smartphones.)

Pros

Very robust autonomy, lasting 3.5 days under moderate usage (best performance to date)

Excellent performance using the factory settings (stationary and mobile)

Fantastic power management during the night.

Cons

Average performance of charging both within its particular segment as well as in the database overall

If the device shows that it has 20% of its power left there is actually only 16% remaining

The Vivo Y72 5G moves into first position in the Battery protocol scoreboard thanks mostly to its remarkable performance in our tests on stationary and comes out substantially ahead of its competitors in this test. Check out vivo y51a touch screen price online.

The table below lists the battery capacity, charger capacity, resolution and display type as well as the processor specifications for the Vivo Y72 5G as well as two of its competitors within the Advanced segment which are those being the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G and the Oppo 5G.

The Vivo Y72 5G has produced impressive results for a phone with the capacity of 5500 milliamps. It is far ahead of the competition. It put up excellent performance during our stationary tests, beating some models with larger batteries, like Samsung Galaxy M51. Samsung Galaxy M51 (7000 mAh).

The downside is that the indicator for battery power isn’t very exact. If it says 20percent, the battery actually only has 16% the battery’s power left.

Stationary

Vivo Y72 5G

104

Highest Score

A robot that is housed in the Faraday cage performs a variety of user-friendly actions using a touch screen that we call the “typical usage scenario” (TUS) including calling, streaming video and so on. The typical usage scenario is 4 hours of usage over 16 hours, and the 8-hour period of “sleep.” The robot continues to perform this sequence of actions every day until it is completely power-depleted.

The Vivo Y72 5G has the top score from our database to date during the TUS tests, which lasted more than 87 hours and 40 minutes. The other devices we compare in this review barely got (or tried to get) beyond 72 hours.

The Y72 5G is able to manage energy consumption exceptionally well in the daytime and at night. In the latter instance the Vivo has a 1% loss..

Vivo Y72 5G

Samsung Galaxy M51

In this test series it is the smartphone that returns in the faraday cage, and our robots are constantly performing actions that are linked to a specific usage (such as streaming video, gaming or gaming, etc.) at one moment. 

Beginning with an 88% charge at 80%, all devices are checked until they’ve used up at least five percent in their batteries.

If calibrated to the same display brightness and speaker volume If calibrated to the same brightness and volume, the Vivo remains ahead of the pack in this regard however, by a lesser percentage. 

It delivers average performance in its class for most uses, except gaming, where it’s one of the top smartphones. The Vivo is superior to the Xiaomi in every use case and is even better than the Oppo in terms of music streaming as well as video playback.

Charging (68)

This DXOMARK Battery scoring for charging is made up of two sub-scores: Fast boost and Full Charge. Full charge tests test the accuracy of the battery’s power gauge. 

They also test the length of time the process takes for charging batteries from 0% to percent capacity, and from 80 percent to 100% as well as determine how much power it requires to charge from 100% charge to an actual fully charged. 

When using the phone at various charges (20 percent 40, 60 percent 60, 80 percent) Tests for quick boost test the amount of power the battery gets after being connected for 5 minutes.

Efficiency (89)

Our efficiency score consists of two sub-scores: Charge up and discharge. Charge up represents the effectiveness of charging the battery to its full capacity (how much power is depleted from the outlet on the wall versus the capability of the battery in addition to the performance of the charger, as well as its remaining consumption).

Discharge refers to the amount of current the phone drains from its battery during usage (the ratio of the battery’s capacity and autonomy). A better autonomy when using smaller batteries means higher performance.

Its Vivo Y72 5G is superior to other phones with bigger batteries and is ahead of both Xiaomi and Oppo models (76 or 80 percent respectively). Check out vivo y12s touch screen digitizer price online.

Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G

The Vivo device’s charging system isn’t very efficient, with 348 mW being the maximum, the power draw when the device is connected is higher than the average. However, its competitors are better and that is the Redmi Note 10 5G expending 276 mW, and the A74 5G using just 220 milliwatts.

Discharge

Vivo Y72 5G

103121

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

Its Vivo Y72 5G is able to attribute its excellent overall Efficiency score to its outstanding discharge efficiency that is a sign of its efficient energy management as well as its sleek design.

Conclusion

Although this Vivo Y72 5G definitely is not the fastest smartphone for charging that we have in our database, displaying an average performance in this class but it’s a balanced device that is what has given it its highest rating to date. This phone’s 3.5 days of battery autonomy when using moderate usage (4 hours per day) as well as more than days of intensive usage (7 hours per day) are sure to calm those who are the most concerned about battery life. it is a battery that can be charged for the weekend is not an issue.